Abstract:In the era of big data,the dual risk-based damage associated with personal information leakage presents unique chal-lenges.The unrealistic nature of objective risk-based damage without benchmarks and the high...Abstract:In the era of big data,the dual risk-based damage associated with personal information leakage presents unique chal-lenges.The unrealistic nature of objective risk-based damage without benchmarks and the high threshold for determining subjective risk-based damage have become obstacles for information subjects seek-ing compensation.Traditional approaches to supporting risk-based damage are inadequate in the realm of personal information.The theoretical support and compensation mechanisms for dual risk-based damage to personal information need re-exploration.The information subject’s control over the value of personal information assets based on the right to know forms the theoretical basis for objective risk-based damage.Additionally,the independence of mental suffering and the relaxation of the“serious”standard allow for a broader in-terpretation of subjective risk-based damage.In addressing claims by information subjects,first,courts need to assess and quantify the level of risk-based damage;second,legislation should introduce a statutory compensation system to define the range of personal information asset value,with a focus on the fault of personal information processors in civil liability;finally,establishing a special representative litigation mechanism can effectively address collective disputes over personal information infringement and alleviate the litigation burden on infor-mation subjects.展开更多
基金“A New Round of Reform and Reconstruction of the International Dis-pute Settlement Mechanism for Intellectual Property Rights and China’s Countermeasures”(Project Number 21BFX101),a 2021 General Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China。
文摘Abstract:In the era of big data,the dual risk-based damage associated with personal information leakage presents unique chal-lenges.The unrealistic nature of objective risk-based damage without benchmarks and the high threshold for determining subjective risk-based damage have become obstacles for information subjects seek-ing compensation.Traditional approaches to supporting risk-based damage are inadequate in the realm of personal information.The theoretical support and compensation mechanisms for dual risk-based damage to personal information need re-exploration.The information subject’s control over the value of personal information assets based on the right to know forms the theoretical basis for objective risk-based damage.Additionally,the independence of mental suffering and the relaxation of the“serious”standard allow for a broader in-terpretation of subjective risk-based damage.In addressing claims by information subjects,first,courts need to assess and quantify the level of risk-based damage;second,legislation should introduce a statutory compensation system to define the range of personal information asset value,with a focus on the fault of personal information processors in civil liability;finally,establishing a special representative litigation mechanism can effectively address collective disputes over personal information infringement and alleviate the litigation burden on infor-mation subjects.
