期刊文献+
共找到8篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Realization of the Function of Basic Rights to Balance Society--taking personal Information Rights as an example
1
作者 马康凤 XU Chao(Translated) 《The Journal of Human Rights》 2023年第6期1224-1250,共27页
The main function of basic rights is to defend against the state’s public power.the traditional theory of basic rights con-structs logic based on the dualistic framework of“state power and individual rights,”and de... The main function of basic rights is to defend against the state’s public power.the traditional theory of basic rights con-structs logic based on the dualistic framework of“state power and individual rights,”and deals with the dualistic horizontal relationship between“the state and individuals.”However,the increasing com-plexity of modern society has led to the emergence of different inter-ests and needs within society and the formation of new social powers,resulting in an unequal relationship between private subjects.In the digital era,this phenomenon has become particularly prominent,ev-idenced by the rise of data-based power and the frequent and serious intrusion of personal information by private subjects.In this context,the value of basic rights should radiate within society and function as a balancing force.taking the protection of personal information as an example,while innovating the idea of regulating society through basic rights,the state’s obligation to protect personal information should be further strengthened.Meanwhile,the direct effect of personal infor-mation rights,which are basic human rights,on the private subjects of data-based power should be established,so as to realize their function in balancing the interests of all parties in society. 展开更多
关键词 basic rights data-based power protection of per-sonal information direct effect
下载PDF
The Rights Logic of Common Prosperity:Structure,Evolution,and Path to Implementation
2
作者 王德志 王必行 CHEN Feng 《The Journal of Human Rights》 2023年第3期531-557,共27页
The concept of common prosperity embodies the right of the people to a happy life,which is in line with General Secretary Xi Jinping’s proposition that“the people’s happiness is the greatest human right.”Its right... The concept of common prosperity embodies the right of the people to a happy life,which is in line with General Secretary Xi Jinping’s proposition that“the people’s happiness is the greatest human right.”Its rights structure has the attributes of collective rights,reflecting the people’s pursuit of material civilization,spiritual civilization,harmony,beauty,and other social values.The realization of these rights is based on individual diligent labor and also entails human rights responsibilities of the state and society.Since the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee,China has pursued the basic policy of reform and opening-up,dismantling institutional barriers that hindered the development of productivity and the full realization of rights.This has stimulated the initiative,enthusiasm,and creativity of the people in their endeavors and entrepreneurship,leading to a historic leap from standing up to becoming prosperous.The living standards of the people have greatly improved.In the new journey toward achieving the second centenary goal,China should follow the important discourse of General Secretary Xi Jinping on respecting and protecting human rights,take the path of socialist human rights with Chinese characteristics,and better meet the growing aspirations of the people for a better life in the pursuit of high-quality economic development. 展开更多
关键词 common prosperity the right of the people to a happy life the right to subsistence protection of human rights
下载PDF
Status Quo and Improvement of Retaliation in the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism
3
作者 Tian Jingnan 《Review of Global Academics》 2014年第4期322-326,共5页
关键词 争端解决机制 WTO 国际贸易 DSU
下载PDF
A Judicial Empirical Study on the Principle of “the Best Interests of the Child”——From the Principles of National Conventions to the Building of Adjudication Norms
4
作者 王德志 王必行 LIU Haile(译) 《The Journal of Human Rights》 2021年第6期1012-1033,共22页
“The best interests of the child”is an essential principle of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.Due to the abstractness and ambiguity of this principle,its application is inevitably subject to the judge’s p... “The best interests of the child”is an essential principle of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.Due to the abstractness and ambiguity of this principle,its application is inevitably subject to the judge’s personality.Through empirical analysis,we can find that the judicial documents invoking the principle of“the best interests of the child”by Chinese courts show a significant increase in the number of disputes,types of disputes,and pronounced regional characteristics.The application of this principle by the courts is highly consistent with the judicial interpretative documents issued by the Supreme People’s Court.The invocation of this principle plays the role of interpreting the provisions of the law,the value basis for discretion,and the value orientation for shaping new rules in adjudication.At the same time,it is plagued by a lack of guidelines for the application of principles,invocations that serve the will of judges,and imperfect thinking in weighing the various factors involved.The application of this principle should be improved by setting normative standards for the principle of“the best interests of the child”,increasing case guidance for invoking the principle,and enhancing the professionalism of judges. 展开更多
关键词 the principle of“the best interests of the child” The Convention on the Rights of the Child the protection of children’s rights the application of justice
下载PDF
Development from Right to Interfere to Responsibility to Protect
5
作者 Tian Jingnan 《Review of Global Academics》 2014年第5期371-375,共5页
关键词 保护 干涉 责任 考核机制 时间
下载PDF
群体权利的跨学科重构(英文)
6
作者 魏华 《China Legal Science》 2015年第3期3-33,共31页
群体权利在人权领域备受争议,其理论上的正当有效性、道德上的可防卫性以及使用这一概念的必要性始终遭受质疑。笔者认为争议的发生概因单纯使用人权思维或法学思维所致。群体权利是一个跨学科概念,唯有冲破传统单一的人权思维、法学界... 群体权利在人权领域备受争议,其理论上的正当有效性、道德上的可防卫性以及使用这一概念的必要性始终遭受质疑。笔者认为争议的发生概因单纯使用人权思维或法学思维所致。群体权利是一个跨学科概念,唯有冲破传统单一的人权思维、法学界限,交叉使用法学、政治哲学、人类学及文化学等学科工具,才能正确理解这一概念,有效为之辩护,并真正解决由它衍生出来的理论和实践问题。人权的目的在于保护人的尊严和福利,而尊严和福利是复杂多面的,所以它必然是立基于集体和个人层面相互关联的复杂利益网络之上的。简单地将人权划分为"个人权利"和"群体权利",再将二者放在相互对立的两极,从理论分析和实际操作上都是把人权片面化、简单化了。更站得住脚的立场应该是:个人权利有群体层面,群体权利也有个人层面,个人权利和群体权利保护难以分割。这一改良立场可解决当前国际少数人权利保护领域论争的核心理论及实践问题,并促使我们将更多的注意力投入到三个方面:一是个人权利和群体权利的相互作用及交融;二是明确权利保护的短期目标和长期目标,关注并规范短期及长期目标的关联及互动;三是更好地平衡伸张少数人文化正义及保护国家地缘政治安全之间的关系。 展开更多
关键词 POLITICAL LIBERAL 学科概念 短期目标 个人权利 长期目标 站得住脚 PLEASURE CONCEPTION 理论分析
原文传递
重复性言词证据排除若干问题研究(英文)
7
作者 田荔枝 权艳平 《China Legal Science》 2015年第2期61-80,共20页
随着非法证据排除制度的出台及其适用,重复言词证据排除问题随之浮出水面,一次非法取证行为,是否意味着受其影响紧随其后的一系列取证行为的"非法",这就关系到重复言词证据的排除问题。排除重复言词证据已经成为有效实施非法... 随着非法证据排除制度的出台及其适用,重复言词证据排除问题随之浮出水面,一次非法取证行为,是否意味着受其影响紧随其后的一系列取证行为的"非法",这就关系到重复言词证据的排除问题。排除重复言词证据已经成为有效实施非法证据排除规则的必然要求,而且非法证据的排除是认定重复言词证据可采性的必经程序,是排除重复言词证据的关键,但是司法实践中法院对非法证据排除所持的消极不作为态度以及现阶段我国法院系统与公安、检察系统的"同质性"等现实问题又意味着排除重复言词证据必将面临重重障碍,另外,我国司法实践中法官自由裁量权的制约以及冤错案的频发,要求重复言词证据的排除必须坚持绝对排除原则,而依据法官自由裁量权决定排除范围的方法是不可行的。 展开更多
关键词 言词证据 非法证据排除 法官自由裁量权 VERBAL 排除原则 evidences EXCLUSION statements 我国法院 ORGANS
原文传递
论第三人撤销诉讼的原告适格(英文)
8
作者 赵信会 《China Legal Science》 2015年第4期84-111,共28页
2012年新民事诉讼法规定了第三人撤销之诉,其具体内容还需进一步充实。目前关于何者可以作为第三人撤销诉讼的原告,理论上和实践中存在非常大的分歧,影响了该制度功能的发挥。理解此问题必须以第三人是否与原诉讼程序中获得了程序保障... 2012年新民事诉讼法规定了第三人撤销之诉,其具体内容还需进一步充实。目前关于何者可以作为第三人撤销诉讼的原告,理论上和实践中存在非常大的分歧,影响了该制度功能的发挥。理解此问题必须以第三人是否与原诉讼程序中获得了程序保障及其有无其他的救济途径获得救济为判断标准。故一般情况下,未参加原审程序的、应以无独立请求权第三人身份参加诉讼的第三人可以具有该类诉讼的原告适格。同时,如果其可以再审途径获得救济,则不具有第三人撤销诉讼的原告适格。 展开更多
关键词 party 适格 JUDGMENT COMPETENCE civil LEGAL 三人 民事诉讼法 SAFEGUARD 程序保障
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部