The study was to compare treatment preference, efficacy, and tolerability of sildenafil citrate （sildenafil） and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction （ED） in Chinese men na＇ive to phosphodiesterase 5 （PDE...The study was to compare treatment preference, efficacy, and tolerability of sildenafil citrate （sildenafil） and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction （ED） in Chinese men na＇ive to phosphodiesterase 5 （PDE5） inhibitor therapies. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study evaluated whether Chinese men with ED preferred 20-mg tadalafil or 100-mg sildenafil. After a 4 weeks baseline assessment, 383 eligible patients were randomized to sequential 20-mg tadalafil per 100-mg sildenafil or vice versa for 8 weeks respectively and then chose which treatment they preferred to take during the 8 weeks extension. Primary efficacy was measured by Question 1 of the PDE5 Inhibitor Treatment Preference Questionnaire （PITPQ）. Secondary efficacy was analyzed by PITPQ Question 2, the International Index of Erectile Function （IIEF） erectile function （EF） domain, sexual encounter profile （SEP） Questions 2 and 3, and the Drug Attributes Questionnaire. Three hundred and fifty men （91%） completed the randomized treatment phase. Two hundred and forty-two per 350 （69.1%） patients preferred 20-mg tadalafil, and 108/350 （30.9%） preferred lO0-mg sildenafil （P 〈 0.001） as their treatment in the 8 weeks extension. Ninety-two per 242 （38%） patients strongly preferred tadalafil and 37/108 （34.3%） strongly the preferred sildenafil. The SEP2 （penetration）, SEP3 （successful intercourse）, and IIEF-EF domain scores were improved in both tadalafil and sildenafil treatment groups. For patients who preferred tadalafil, getting an erection long after taking the medication was the most reported reason for tadalafil preference. The only treatment-emergent adverse event reported by 〉 2% of men was headache. After tadalafil and sildenafil treatments, more Chinese men with ED na＇ive to PDE5 inhibitor preferred tadalafil. Both sildenafil and tadalafil treatments were effective and safe.展开更多
The impact of erectile dysfunction is distressing to both males and their female partners, but less attention has been paid to identify female partners＇ preferred treatment and sexual quality of life outcomes. The pr...The impact of erectile dysfunction is distressing to both males and their female partners, but less attention has been paid to identify female partners＇ preferred treatment and sexual quality of life outcomes. The present analysis explores female partners＇ treatment preference for erectile dysfunction in Chinese Men. This was a phase 4, randomized, open-label, multicenter, crossover study in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction who were na＇fve to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor treatments. Eligible patients were randomized to sequential 20-mg tadalafil/100-mg sildenafil or lO0-mg sildenafil/20-mg tadalafil for 8 weeks each. Of 418 patients, female partners of 64 patients agreed to enter the study; of 64 patients who entered the study with female partners, 63 were randomized, and 62 completed the study. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Significantly more couples preferred tadalafil compared with sildenafil overall （75.4% vs 24.6%; P〈 0.001）, and irrespective of erectile dysfunction severity at baseline （P 〈 0.005）. Significant improvements in sexual quality of life scores were reported at endpoint （Visit 8） in male patients and female partners in both tadalafil and sildenafil treatment groups （P 〈 0.001）. Significantly higher mean changes from baseline were observed for male patients in the tadalafil group compared with the sildenafil group for the erectile function （P = 0.013） and overall satisfaction （P = 0.019） International Index for Erectile Function domains and the spontaneity domain （P〈 0.001） of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scale. No major safety concerns were reported during the study. Though both treatments were effective, safe, and tolerable, more couples preferred tadalafil compared with sildenafil.展开更多
Ultra rapid lispro(URLi)is a novel formulation of insulin lispro designed to more closely match the physiological insulin response to a meal,with the aim of improving postprandial glucose(PPG)control.We conducted a mu...Ultra rapid lispro(URLi)is a novel formulation of insulin lispro designed to more closely match the physiological insulin response to a meal,with the aim of improving postprandial glucose(PPG)control.We conducted a multinational,multicenter,randomized,double-blind,treat-to-target,26-week,phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of URLi in adults with type 2 diabetes(T2D).After an 8-week lead-in period during which basal insulin glargine or degludec was optimized,adults with T2D were randomized(2:1)to prandial URLi(n=395)or lispro(n=200).The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of URLi versus lispro in glycated hemoglobin A1c(HbA_(1c))change from baseline to week 26.Multiplicity-adjusted analyses were performed to assess the superiority of URLi in 1-and 2-h PPG excursions during a mixed-meal tolerance test(MMTT)and HbA_(1c) change at week 26.URLi showed non-inferiority for Hb Achange at week 26 versus lispro(least-squares mean[LSM]difference,0.07%;95%confidence interval:-0.07,0.21).HbA_(1c) was reduced by 0.56%and 0.63%with URLi and lispro,respectively,with no significant treatment difference(P=0.321).URLi provided superior PPG excursion control versus lispro at1 h(LSM difference:-14.6 mg/d L,P<0.001)and 2 h(LSM difference:-21.8 mg/d L,P<0.001)as well as other time points(30–240 min)during the MMTT.Incremental area under the glucose curve during the MMTT was also significantly lower with URLi versus lispro.The safety profiles were generally similar between treatment groups.In conclusion,URLi was superior to lispro for PPG control,with noninferiority in HbA_(1c) improvement,in adults with T2D.展开更多
To the Editor:Rheumatoid arthritis(RA)is a chronic autoimmune disorder not only characterized by joint symptoms but also extra-articular and systemic manifestations.[1]Traditionally,the evaluations of RA had centered ...To the Editor:Rheumatoid arthritis(RA)is a chronic autoimmune disorder not only characterized by joint symptoms but also extra-articular and systemic manifestations.[1]Traditionally,the evaluations of RA had centered on laboratory measures of inflammation and clinician-generated assessments.However,patientreported outcomes(PROs)are recommended by several guidelines to assess disease progression.PROs also can contribute to reduce discrepancies between physicians’evaluation and patients’own judgment on disease status and their importance on disease management and physician-patient communication has been identified during the past decennia.[2]However,it is uncertain whether the awareness has promoted the usage and reporting of PRO measures in RA-related research and clinical practice in Chinese population.Thus,this study systematically reviewed the PRO measures collected in recent researches and summarized the PRO results among Chinese RA population.展开更多
Sildenafil and tadalafil are efficacious and well tolerated in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction （ED）. Recent study results indicate that men with ED in China who were naive to phosphodiesterase inhibitor type 5...Sildenafil and tadalafil are efficacious and well tolerated in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction （ED）. Recent study results indicate that men with ED in China who were naive to phosphodiesterase inhibitor type 5 （PDE5） therapy prefer tadalafil 20-mg （on-demand） versus sildenafil 100-mg （on-demand）. Differences in psychosocial outcomes may help to explain treatment preference in favor of tadalafih This open-label, randomized, crossover study compared psychosocial outcomes and drug attribute choices between tadalafil and sildenafil in Chinese men with ED na＇（ve to PDE5 inhibitor therapy. Eligible patients were randomized to sequential 20-mg tadalafU/lOO-mg sildenafil （n = 190） or 100-mg sildenafil/20-mg tadalafil （n = 193） for 8 weeks each and were asked which treatment they preferred to take for the 8-week extension phase. Psychosocial outcomes were assessed using the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scale （PAIRS）, Drug Attributes Questionnaire （DRAQ）, and Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire （SLQQ）. When taking tadalafil versus sildenafil, men had a higher mean endpoint score on the PAIRS Spontaneity Domain （tadalafil = 2.86 vs sildenafil = 2.72; P 〈 0.001）, and a lower mean endpoint score on the Time Concerns Domain （tadalafil = 2.41 vs sildenafil = 2.55; P 〈 0.001）. A numerical increase in the Sexual Self-Confidence Domain was observed when taking tadalafil versus sildenafil （tadalafil -- 2.76 vs sildenafil = 2.72; P= 0.102）. The most frequently chosen drug attributes explaining treatment preference were able to get an erection long after having drug, and ability to get an erection every time. SLQQ results were comparable between treatment groups. These psychosocial outcomes may explain why more Chinese men preferred tadalafil versus sildenafil for the treatment of ED in this clinical trial.展开更多
Once-daily tadalafil administration has been well established; however, studies about tadalafil once-daily treatment in the Chinese population are lacking. In this phase 4, postmarketing study, we ascertained the long...Once-daily tadalafil administration has been well established; however, studies about tadalafil once-daily treatment in the Chinese population are lacking. In this phase 4, postmarketing study, we ascertained the long-term safety and effectiveness of tadalafil 2.5 mg and 5.0 mg once daily in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction （n = 635）. The primary endpoint of the study was safety at 12 months as assessed by the proportion of patients experiencing at least one treatment-emergent adverse event （serious or nonserious）. The secondary endpoints included safety and effectiveness, measured by the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function （IIEF-EF） domain scores. Similar adverse events to the known safety profile of tadalafil, such as nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and dizziness, were detected. No new cardiovascular safety concerns were observed. After 3 months of treatment, significant increases in IIEF-EF domain scores were detected for both 2.5-mg （least squares [LS] mean change： 6.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]： 5.4-7.1; P 〈 0.001） and 5.0-mg （LS mean change： 7.4; 95% CI： 6.8-7.9; P 〈 0.001） tadalafil doses, and significance was maintained up to 12 months. In addition, approximately 40% of patients regained normal erectile function （IIEF-EF 〉26） following 1 year of tadalafil once-daily treatment. The findings in this study provide evidence for the extended effectiveness and tolerability of tadalafil, demonstrating no new safety concerns, in a Chinese population and make once-daily tadalafil administration a viable option for improving sexual performance and satisfaction in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction.展开更多
文摘The study was to compare treatment preference, efficacy, and tolerability of sildenafil citrate （sildenafil） and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction （ED） in Chinese men na＇ive to phosphodiesterase 5 （PDE5） inhibitor therapies. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study evaluated whether Chinese men with ED preferred 20-mg tadalafil or 100-mg sildenafil. After a 4 weeks baseline assessment, 383 eligible patients were randomized to sequential 20-mg tadalafil per 100-mg sildenafil or vice versa for 8 weeks respectively and then chose which treatment they preferred to take during the 8 weeks extension. Primary efficacy was measured by Question 1 of the PDE5 Inhibitor Treatment Preference Questionnaire （PITPQ）. Secondary efficacy was analyzed by PITPQ Question 2, the International Index of Erectile Function （IIEF） erectile function （EF） domain, sexual encounter profile （SEP） Questions 2 and 3, and the Drug Attributes Questionnaire. Three hundred and fifty men （91%） completed the randomized treatment phase. Two hundred and forty-two per 350 （69.1%） patients preferred 20-mg tadalafil, and 108/350 （30.9%） preferred lO0-mg sildenafil （P 〈 0.001） as their treatment in the 8 weeks extension. Ninety-two per 242 （38%） patients strongly preferred tadalafil and 37/108 （34.3%） strongly the preferred sildenafil. The SEP2 （penetration）, SEP3 （successful intercourse）, and IIEF-EF domain scores were improved in both tadalafil and sildenafil treatment groups. For patients who preferred tadalafil, getting an erection long after taking the medication was the most reported reason for tadalafil preference. The only treatment-emergent adverse event reported by 〉 2% of men was headache. After tadalafil and sildenafil treatments, more Chinese men with ED na＇ive to PDE5 inhibitor preferred tadalafil. Both sildenafil and tadalafil treatments were effective and safe.
文摘The impact of erectile dysfunction is distressing to both males and their female partners, but less attention has been paid to identify female partners＇ preferred treatment and sexual quality of life outcomes. The present analysis explores female partners＇ treatment preference for erectile dysfunction in Chinese Men. This was a phase 4, randomized, open-label, multicenter, crossover study in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction who were na＇fve to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor treatments. Eligible patients were randomized to sequential 20-mg tadalafil/100-mg sildenafil or lO0-mg sildenafil/20-mg tadalafil for 8 weeks each. Of 418 patients, female partners of 64 patients agreed to enter the study; of 64 patients who entered the study with female partners, 63 were randomized, and 62 completed the study. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Significantly more couples preferred tadalafil compared with sildenafil overall （75.4% vs 24.6%; P〈 0.001）, and irrespective of erectile dysfunction severity at baseline （P 〈 0.005）. Significant improvements in sexual quality of life scores were reported at endpoint （Visit 8） in male patients and female partners in both tadalafil and sildenafil treatment groups （P 〈 0.001）. Significantly higher mean changes from baseline were observed for male patients in the tadalafil group compared with the sildenafil group for the erectile function （P = 0.013） and overall satisfaction （P = 0.019） International Index for Erectile Function domains and the spontaneity domain （P〈 0.001） of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scale. No major safety concerns were reported during the study. Though both treatments were effective, safe, and tolerable, more couples preferred tadalafil compared with sildenafil.
文摘Ultra rapid lispro(URLi)is a novel formulation of insulin lispro designed to more closely match the physiological insulin response to a meal,with the aim of improving postprandial glucose(PPG)control.We conducted a multinational,multicenter,randomized,double-blind,treat-to-target,26-week,phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of URLi in adults with type 2 diabetes(T2D).After an 8-week lead-in period during which basal insulin glargine or degludec was optimized,adults with T2D were randomized(2:1)to prandial URLi(n=395)or lispro(n=200).The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of URLi versus lispro in glycated hemoglobin A1c(HbA_(1c))change from baseline to week 26.Multiplicity-adjusted analyses were performed to assess the superiority of URLi in 1-and 2-h PPG excursions during a mixed-meal tolerance test(MMTT)and HbA_(1c) change at week 26.URLi showed non-inferiority for Hb Achange at week 26 versus lispro(least-squares mean[LSM]difference,0.07%;95%confidence interval:-0.07,0.21).HbA_(1c) was reduced by 0.56%and 0.63%with URLi and lispro,respectively,with no significant treatment difference(P=0.321).URLi provided superior PPG excursion control versus lispro at1 h(LSM difference:-14.6 mg/d L,P<0.001)and 2 h(LSM difference:-21.8 mg/d L,P<0.001)as well as other time points(30–240 min)during the MMTT.Incremental area under the glucose curve during the MMTT was also significantly lower with URLi versus lispro.The safety profiles were generally similar between treatment groups.In conclusion,URLi was superior to lispro for PPG control,with noninferiority in HbA_(1c) improvement,in adults with T2D.
文摘To the Editor:Rheumatoid arthritis(RA)is a chronic autoimmune disorder not only characterized by joint symptoms but also extra-articular and systemic manifestations.[1]Traditionally,the evaluations of RA had centered on laboratory measures of inflammation and clinician-generated assessments.However,patientreported outcomes(PROs)are recommended by several guidelines to assess disease progression.PROs also can contribute to reduce discrepancies between physicians’evaluation and patients’own judgment on disease status and their importance on disease management and physician-patient communication has been identified during the past decennia.[2]However,it is uncertain whether the awareness has promoted the usage and reporting of PRO measures in RA-related research and clinical practice in Chinese population.Thus,this study systematically reviewed the PRO measures collected in recent researches and summarized the PRO results among Chinese RA population.
文摘Sildenafil and tadalafil are efficacious and well tolerated in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction （ED）. Recent study results indicate that men with ED in China who were naive to phosphodiesterase inhibitor type 5 （PDE5） therapy prefer tadalafil 20-mg （on-demand） versus sildenafil 100-mg （on-demand）. Differences in psychosocial outcomes may help to explain treatment preference in favor of tadalafih This open-label, randomized, crossover study compared psychosocial outcomes and drug attribute choices between tadalafil and sildenafil in Chinese men with ED na＇（ve to PDE5 inhibitor therapy. Eligible patients were randomized to sequential 20-mg tadalafU/lOO-mg sildenafil （n = 190） or 100-mg sildenafil/20-mg tadalafil （n = 193） for 8 weeks each and were asked which treatment they preferred to take for the 8-week extension phase. Psychosocial outcomes were assessed using the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scale （PAIRS）, Drug Attributes Questionnaire （DRAQ）, and Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire （SLQQ）. When taking tadalafil versus sildenafil, men had a higher mean endpoint score on the PAIRS Spontaneity Domain （tadalafil = 2.86 vs sildenafil = 2.72; P 〈 0.001）, and a lower mean endpoint score on the Time Concerns Domain （tadalafil = 2.41 vs sildenafil = 2.55; P 〈 0.001）. A numerical increase in the Sexual Self-Confidence Domain was observed when taking tadalafil versus sildenafil （tadalafil -- 2.76 vs sildenafil = 2.72; P= 0.102）. The most frequently chosen drug attributes explaining treatment preference were able to get an erection long after having drug, and ability to get an erection every time. SLQQ results were comparable between treatment groups. These psychosocial outcomes may explain why more Chinese men preferred tadalafil versus sildenafil for the treatment of ED in this clinical trial.
文摘Once-daily tadalafil administration has been well established; however, studies about tadalafil once-daily treatment in the Chinese population are lacking. In this phase 4, postmarketing study, we ascertained the long-term safety and effectiveness of tadalafil 2.5 mg and 5.0 mg once daily in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction （n = 635）. The primary endpoint of the study was safety at 12 months as assessed by the proportion of patients experiencing at least one treatment-emergent adverse event （serious or nonserious）. The secondary endpoints included safety and effectiveness, measured by the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function （IIEF-EF） domain scores. Similar adverse events to the known safety profile of tadalafil, such as nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and dizziness, were detected. No new cardiovascular safety concerns were observed. After 3 months of treatment, significant increases in IIEF-EF domain scores were detected for both 2.5-mg （least squares [LS] mean change： 6.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]： 5.4-7.1; P 〈 0.001） and 5.0-mg （LS mean change： 7.4; 95% CI： 6.8-7.9; P 〈 0.001） tadalafil doses, and significance was maintained up to 12 months. In addition, approximately 40% of patients regained normal erectile function （IIEF-EF 〉26） following 1 year of tadalafil once-daily treatment. The findings in this study provide evidence for the extended effectiveness and tolerability of tadalafil, demonstrating no new safety concerns, in a Chinese population and make once-daily tadalafil administration a viable option for improving sexual performance and satisfaction in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction.
