期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Prioritizing Patient Assessment Data (PAD) Using the Japanese Psychiatric Nursing Assessment Classification System (PsyNACS)©
1
作者 Hirokazu Ito Misao Miyagawa +7 位作者 Kazuhiro Ozawa Tetsuya Tanioka Yuko Yasuhara Mutsuko Kataoka Beth King Masahito Tomotake Yumi Kuwamura Rozzano C. Locsin 《Open Journal of Psychiatry》 2016年第3期218-227,共11页
The study identified priorities of the Patient Assessment Data (PAD) using the Japanese Psychiatric Nursing Assessment Classification System (PsyNACS&copy;) derived from 644 psychiatric nurses’ responses who were... The study identified priorities of the Patient Assessment Data (PAD) using the Japanese Psychiatric Nursing Assessment Classification System (PsyNACS&copy;) derived from 644 psychiatric nurses’ responses who were practicing in specific units: Acute Care Units (ACU), General Care Units (GCU), Long-term Care Units (LCU), physically Complicated Disease Care Units (CDCU), and Dementia Care Units (DCU). Secondary analysis of the PsyNACS&copy;on-line survey data using four levels of “importance” was used to determine the priorities: 1) unnecessary;2) quite important;3) important and 4) very important. The Mean Factor Points (MFP) and the Welch’s ANOVA were calculated. PsyNACS&copy;score of 3 or higher indicates the PAD as priority. The results showed that in the ACU PAD1, “Psychological symptom”, “Stress coping”, and “Mood disorder and aggression”, and PAD2 “Information of adherence”, and “Information of the psychiatry rehabilitation”, and PAD7 “Situation of the family and social life”, “Relationship to the health care providers”, and “Relationships with others” are high priority (high importance). Other PADs showed results below PsyNACS&copy;score of 3. The GCU had PAD 3 “Balance of water”, the LCU had PAD 4 “Intention/Point of view”, and “Thoughts of the patient” and PAD 7 “Disease and family”. The CDCU showed PAD 2 “Blood test”, PAD 3 “Excretion situation”, and PAD 5 “General health condition”, “Respiratory and chest symptom”, and “Vital signs”, and the DCU had PAD 1 “Cognition function”, and “Delirium and derangement capacity to register failure”, PAD 3 “Function of eating”, PAD 6 “Egestion and cleanliness” and PAD 8 “Activity and sleeping”, and “Mobility capability”. These classifications indicated levels of importance in the CAD comprising the PAD below the score of “2”. Japanese psychiatric hospitals specify assessments according to functional areas. By prioritizing the CAD for each PAD, more effective and efficient assessments can be performed according to practice unit. 展开更多
关键词 PsyNACS© Nursing Database Priority Nursing Assessment Items Unit Function Psychiatric Hospital
下载PDF
The Development of the Japanese Psychiatric Nursing Assessment Classification System (PsyNACS©)
2
作者 Hirokazu Ito Misao Miyagawa +6 位作者 Kazuhiro Ozawa Tetsuya Tanioka Yuko Yasuhara Mutsuko Kataoka Beth King Masahito Tomotake Rozzano C. Locsin 《Open Journal of Psychiatry》 2016年第1期20-33,共14页
The purpose of this study was to develop the Japanese Psychiatric Nursing Assessment Classification System (PsyNACS)<sup><sup>&copy</sup></sup>. This study used the on-line survey method fr... The purpose of this study was to develop the Japanese Psychiatric Nursing Assessment Classification System (PsyNACS)<sup><sup>&copy</sup></sup>. This study used the on-line survey method from February to April 2015. There were 644 respondents comprised of professional nurses with minimum qualification of 3 years’ experience being in a psychiatric unit of a stand-alone 200-bed or more Psychiatric Hospital in Japan. Assessment items were derived from 211 specific items selected from nursing textbooks, excluding the North-American-Nursing-Diagnosis-Association (NANDA). The questionnaire contained Cover Letter, Demographic Data Sheet, and the PsyNACS<sup><sup>&copy</sup></sup> questionnaire. There were 644 questionnaires accessed but only 435 were completed and valid. Item levels of importance were evaluated: 1) Unnecessary, 2) Not very important, 3) Important and 4) Very important. Data analysis used descriptive and multivariate statistics. Factor analysis (principal factor analysis, varimax rotation), the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and the Bartlett’s test of Sphericity assessed the adaptive validity of the factor analysis. Factor loadings were set at 0.4 or more for the configuration of items. Internal consistency and reliability were established using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Mean factor points were calculated, including standard deviation, range, and confidence interval at 95%. Statistical significance was at 0.05 level. Nine Patient Assessment Data (PAD) with 2 to 5 Cluster Assessment Data (CAD) each were categorized. Thirty one CADs comprised the Patient Assessment Data: (PAD1) Psychological symptom and stress, (PAD2) Information about treatment, (PAD3) Function of eating and balance of water, (PAD4) Life and value, (PAD5) Vital signs and health assessment, (PAD6) Self-care, (PAD7) Social support, (PAD8) Activity, sleeping and mobility capability, and (PAD9) Sexual function and sexual behavior. The PsyNACS<sup><sup><sup>&copy</sup></sup></sup> is a classification of items assessing health care needs within the Japanese psychiatric nursing care environment, and also can be used in various psychiatric patient care situations in all psychiatric units. 展开更多
关键词 PsyNACS Psychiatric Nursing Patient Assessment Data Psychiatric Hospital
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部