AIM： To explore the propriety of providing hepatitis B virus （HBV） genotypes F and H with two distinct genotypes. METHODS： Eleven HBV isolates of genotype F （HBV/F） were recovered from patients living in San Fra...AIM： To explore the propriety of providing hepatitis B virus （HBV） genotypes F and H with two distinct genotypes. METHODS： Eleven HBV isolates of genotype F （HBV/F） were recovered from patients living in San Francisco, Japan, Panama, and Venezuela, and their full-length sequences were determined. Phylogenetic analysis was carded out among them along with HBV isolates previously reported. RESULTS： Seven of them clustered with reported HBV/F Isolates in the phylogenetic tree constructed on the entire genomic sequence. The remaining four flocked on another branch along with three HBV isolates formerly reported as genotype H. These seven HBV isolates, including the four in this study and the three reported, had a sequence divergence of 7.3-9.5% from the other HBV/F isolates, and differed by 〉13.7% from HBV isolates of the other six genotypes （A-E and G）. Based on a marked genomic divergence, falling just short of 〉8% separating the seven genotypes, these seven HBV/F isolates were classified into F2 subtype and the former seven into F1 subtype provisionally. In a pairwise comparison of the S-gene sequences among the 7 HBV/F2 isolates and against 47 HBV/F1 isolates as well as 136 representing the other six genotypes （A-E and G）, two clusters separated by distinct genetic distances emerged.CONCLUSION： Based on these analyses, dassifying HBV/ F isolates into two subtypes （F1 and F2） would be more appropriate than providing them with two distinct genotypes （F and H）.展开更多
文摘AIM： To explore the propriety of providing hepatitis B virus （HBV） genotypes F and H with two distinct genotypes. METHODS： Eleven HBV isolates of genotype F （HBV/F） were recovered from patients living in San Francisco, Japan, Panama, and Venezuela, and their full-length sequences were determined. Phylogenetic analysis was carded out among them along with HBV isolates previously reported. RESULTS： Seven of them clustered with reported HBV/F Isolates in the phylogenetic tree constructed on the entire genomic sequence. The remaining four flocked on another branch along with three HBV isolates formerly reported as genotype H. These seven HBV isolates, including the four in this study and the three reported, had a sequence divergence of 7.3-9.5% from the other HBV/F isolates, and differed by 〉13.7% from HBV isolates of the other six genotypes （A-E and G）. Based on a marked genomic divergence, falling just short of 〉8% separating the seven genotypes, these seven HBV/F isolates were classified into F2 subtype and the former seven into F1 subtype provisionally. In a pairwise comparison of the S-gene sequences among the 7 HBV/F2 isolates and against 47 HBV/F1 isolates as well as 136 representing the other six genotypes （A-E and G）, two clusters separated by distinct genetic distances emerged.CONCLUSION： Based on these analyses, dassifying HBV/ F isolates into two subtypes （F1 and F2） would be more appropriate than providing them with two distinct genotypes （F and H）.
