期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Towards a comprehensive understanding of p75 neurotrophin receptor functions and interactions in the brain 被引量:3
1
作者 Joel F.Ritala Seán BLyne +2 位作者 Antti Sajanti Romuald Girard Janne Koskimäki 《Neural Regeneration Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2022年第4期701-704,共4页
The role of neurotrophins in neuronal plasticity has recently become a strong focus in neuroregeneration research field to elucidate the biological mechanisms by which these molecules modulate synapses,modify the resp... The role of neurotrophins in neuronal plasticity has recently become a strong focus in neuroregeneration research field to elucidate the biological mechanisms by which these molecules modulate synapses,modify the response to injury,and alter the adaptation response.Intriguingly,the prior studies highlight the role of p75 neurotrophin receptor(p75^(NTR))in various injuries and diseases such as central nervous system injuries,Alzheimer's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.More comprehensive elucidation of the mechanisms,and therapies targeting these molecular signaling networks may allow for neuronal tissue regeneration following an injury.Due to a diverse role of the p75^(NTR)in biology,the body of evidence comprising its biological role is diffusely spread out over numerous fields.This review condenses the main evidence of p75^(NTR)for clinical applications and presents new findings from published literature how data mining approach combined with bioinformatic analyses can be utilized to gain new hypotheses in a molecular and network level. 展开更多
关键词 BIOINFORMATICS brain injury data mining NEURON NEUROTROPHINS p75^(NTR) PLASTICITY REGENERATION
下载PDF
脑静脉畸形与脑海绵状血管畸形的遗传起源不同
2
作者 Guclu B. Ozturk A.K. +2 位作者 Pricola K.L. M. Gunel 张平 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(神经病学分册)》 2006年第3期58-58,共1页
Background and Purpose -Pathogenesis of cerebral venous malformation (CVM) is unknown. Because of coexistence of CVM and cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM), some studies have suggested that these 2 entities share ... Background and Purpose -Pathogenesis of cerebral venous malformation (CVM) is unknown. Because of coexistence of CVM and cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM), some studies have suggested that these 2 entities share a common origin and pathogenetic mechanism. Methods -We have identified and ascertained over 200 families with CCM. Among these, 1 unique family was found to have members affected by both disorders. We have performed mutational analysis in all 3 CCM genes, KRIT1, Malcavernin, and PDCD10, to identify the causative gene in the family. Results -Mutational analysis revealed a frameshift mutation affecting exon 19 of the CCM1 gene (KRIT1) in members with CCM, whereas no such mutation was observed in the member with CVM. Conclusions -These findings support the hypothesis that CVM and CCM are 2 distinct entities with different pathogenetic mechanisms. This data further supports the hypothesis that CVM has a distinct biology and clinical behavior when compared to CCM. CVM is a benign developmental anomaly and should be managed separately from CCM. 展开更多
关键词 海绵状血管畸形 静脉畸形 家庭成员 发育性 突变分析 致病基因 移码突变 发病机制 临床症状
下载PDF
脑海绵状血管畸形临床诊疗指南概要:血管瘤联盟科学咨询委员会临床专家组基于系统文献评价的共识推荐 被引量:4
3
作者 Amy Akers Rustam Al-Shahi Salman +17 位作者 Issam A. Awad Kristen Dahlem Kelly Flemming Blaine Hart Helen Kim Ignacio Jusue-Torres Douglas Kondziolka Cornelia Lee Leslie Morrison Daniele Rigamonti Tania Rebeiz Elisabeth Toumier-Lasserve Darrel Waggoner Kevin Whitehead 鄂同舟 雷宇 倪伟 顾宇翔 《国际脑血管病杂志》 2017年第7期577-591,共15页
背景尽管脑海绵状血管畸形(cerebral cavernous malformation, CCM)的相关研究文献已相当丰富,但在诊断和治疗策略方面仍存在着争议。目的制订CCM诊疗指南。方法作为代表CCM患者和研究的患者支持团体,血管瘤联盟(www.angioma.org... 背景尽管脑海绵状血管畸形(cerebral cavernous malformation, CCM)的相关研究文献已相当丰富,但在诊断和治疗策略方面仍存在着争议。目的制订CCM诊疗指南。方法作为代表CCM患者和研究的患者支持团体,血管瘤联盟(www.angioma.org)召集了一个包括CCM临床专家在内的多学科写作组来帮助总结现有的CCM临床诊疗相关文献,重点关注5个主题:(1)流行病学和自然病程;(2)遗传检测和咨询;(3)诊断标准和影像学标准;(4)神经外科注意事项;(5)神经内科注意事项。写作组根据预定方案进行了文献回顾和证据评价,最终制定推荐意见,并且确立了共识、争议和知识空白。结果根据方法学标准从1983年1月1日至2014年9月31日期间公开发表的1 270篇文献中筛选出98篇,并确定了另外38篇近期或相关的文献。各主题作者利用这些文献总结了现有知识并形成了23项共识诊疗推荐,同时根据美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会标准进行了推荐强度(效应量)和证据水平(确定性估计)评级。其中,尚无A级证据(因为缺乏随机对照试验),B级证据11项(48%),C级证据12项(52%);Ⅰ级推荐8项(35%),Ⅱ级推荐10项(43%),Ⅲ级推荐5项(22%)。结论现有证据支持对CCM诊疗的推荐,但这些证据的级别和推荐强度普遍较低,因此需要进一步研究来帮助进行更好的临床实践并更新这些推荐。完整的推荐文档包括引用文献的纳入标准、关于各项推荐更详尽的评判标准以及各种争议和知识空白的总结,同样通过了同行评议并可在线获取(www.angioma.org/CCMGuidelines)。 展开更多
关键词 海绵状 血管瘤 血管畸形 指南 推荐
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部