期刊文献+
共找到7篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Preventive Oncology International:A brief history of HPV self-collected vaginal specimens for cervical cancer screening
1
作者 Jerome L.Belinson Robert G.Pretorius +1 位作者 Ruifang Wu Youlin Qiao 《Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine》 2023年第3期144-148,共5页
Since 1998,Preventive Oncology International,Inc.(POI)has been at the forefront of studying human papillomavirus(HPV)self-collection for cervical cancer screening,with a significant focus in China.Through multiple cli... Since 1998,Preventive Oncology International,Inc.(POI)has been at the forefront of studying human papillomavirus(HPV)self-collection for cervical cancer screening,with a significant focus in China.Through multiple clinical trials over the past 25 years,POI has explored various aspects related to self-collection methodologies.In 2004–2006,POI established that self-collection could be equivalent to direct endocervical samples.Subsequently,a large randomized trial involving 10,000 patients in 2010 further confirmed that self-collected vaginal specimens,tested for high-risk HPV(hrHPV)using a PCR-based assay with high analytic sensitivity,could effectively replace endocervical specimens with minimal loss of sensitivity and a slight decrease in specificity.Throughout the years,POI's research has encompassed several crucial topics,including patient acceptance,the development of new cost-effective,simpler,and faster assays,exploring different collection devices,devising efficient methods of specimen transport,and implementing population-based screening systems.The findings strongly support the integration of self-collection methodologies into cervical cancer control programs worldwide,particularly in medically underserved regions.As HPV self-collection continues to evolve,ongoing research and innovations are expected to play a pivotal role in achieving the global mission of combating cervical cancer. 展开更多
关键词 Human papillomavirus(HPV) Self-collection SELF-SAMPLING Cervical cancer screening
原文传递
深圳人群人乳头瘤病毒感染亚型分布与宫颈上皮内瘤变现况横断面调查 被引量:30
2
作者 梁凌云 杜辉 +8 位作者 王纯 张薇 陈芸 渠新风 杨斌 吴波 吴若松 Jerome L.Belinson 吴瑞芳 《北京大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期114-118,共5页
目的:研究深圳地区人群人乳头瘤病毒(human papilloma virus,HPV)感染与宫颈上皮内瘤变(cervical in-traepithelial neoplasia,CIN)的患病情况及HPV亚型与病毒载量的致病性。方法:以深圳市及周边农村地区10 000名有性生活的女性为研究对... 目的:研究深圳地区人群人乳头瘤病毒(human papilloma virus,HPV)感染与宫颈上皮内瘤变(cervical in-traepithelial neoplasia,CIN)的患病情况及HPV亚型与病毒载量的致病性。方法:以深圳市及周边农村地区10 000名有性生活的女性为研究对象,以液基细胞学联合多种高危型HPV检测方法进行宫颈癌筛查,对细胞学结果为意义不明的不典型鳞状上皮细胞(atypical squamous cells of undetermined sign,ASC-US)及以上者或任一种HPV检测结果阳性者行阴道镜下宫颈活检,病理诊断。结果:研究人群平均年龄38.9岁,HPV感染率16.6%,随年龄增长呈上升趋势。低度CIN(CIN1)现患率17.0%,55岁以后患病率明显下降;高度CIN(CIN2/3)现患率2.6%,45~59岁组患病率显著较高。高危型HPV感染与CIN患病明显相关,CIN1和CIN2/3的患病风险均随HPV病毒载量的升高而升高,但其相关的HPV高危亚型不同,CIN2/3主要为HPV-16、-58、-31、-33和-18型感染,CIN1主要为HPV-39、-58、-59、-52和-66型感染。结论:深圳地区的HPV感染率和CIN现患率处于较高水平;人群HPV感染有随年龄递增的趋势,45岁以上的人群为CIN2/3的重点监控对象;感染的高危型HPV亚型和载量均可提示CIN2/3患病机会的多少,并作为临床合理干预的重要依据。 展开更多
关键词 人乳头瘤病毒 宫颈上皮内瘤样病变 横断面研究
下载PDF
A Pilot Study to Evaluate an Internet-Based Cervical Cancer Screening Model Based on Self-Sampling 被引量:4
3
作者 Ruifang Wu Xinfeng Qu +7 位作者 Hui Du Zhihong Liu Qicai Hu Chun Wang Lijie Zhang Jinghui Zhao Guixang Wang Jerome Leslie Belinson 《Health》 CAS 2016年第7期672-679,共8页
Background: Community based cervical cancer screening models using self-collection can effectively place the identification of who is positive in the hands of the patient. The key areas we have identified as critical ... Background: Community based cervical cancer screening models using self-collection can effectively place the identification of who is positive in the hands of the patient. The key areas we have identified as critical are 1) education, 2) notification of screening opportunities, 3) registration, 4) submission of samples, 5) receiving results with an explanation, and 6) being advised where to receive evaluation and management from qualified healthcare personnel. Methods: Our primary objectives were to create, register, and pilot a website as a public platform for cervical cancer prevention for both city and rural, individual and organizational application. We selected two sites: Shenzhen City in China as the local city (individual participant) site, and Sangzhi County in Hunan Province as the remote (group management) site. The website was reviewable to all of China, but applications for screening and registration were open only to the women from the 2 pilot sites. In the local site, the women would first sign up (obtain a password) to view the website (www.mcareu.com), and then if they desired, they could register for screening using their true name and their state ID. After an offline confirmation of the address, the sampling kit would arrive. Results were available with additional education and guidance for care also on the website. Findings: 120,099 people nationwide visited the website in 27 months by the end of May, 2015, 1148 women from the sites registered at the website and 87.5% enrolled in the pilot trial. 72.3% of those testing positive returned for management. Virtually 100% of the registration/historical information was entered appropriately and 100% of the samples were handled properly. Interpretation: Web-based decision aids help patients through the uncertainties of healthcare. Applied to cervical cancer screening using self-collection, the effectiveness of the model specifically in respect to accessibility, education, registration, data input, and instructions for positive management was clearly demonstrated by this pilot as well as the potential for future diagnostics applicable to self-collection. 展开更多
关键词 Cervical Cancer Internet Screening Self-Collection
下载PDF
BMRT-HPV用于子宫颈癌筛查的有效性评价 被引量:7
4
作者 段律芳 杜辉 +9 位作者 王纯 黄霞 渠新风 段仙芝 刘彦 石彬 张蔚 魏丽惠 Jerome L.Belinson 吴瑞芳 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第10期708-715,共8页
目的评价核酸分型定量法HPV检测(BMRT-HPV)用于子宫颈癌筛查的临床价值。方法采用巢式抽样法,在2016年9月—2018年1月中国子宫颈癌筛查多中心研究(CHIMUST)项目5个筛查点的8856例妇女中,选取其中医生取样或自取样标本中任一检测方法HPV... 目的评价核酸分型定量法HPV检测(BMRT-HPV)用于子宫颈癌筛查的临床价值。方法采用巢式抽样法,在2016年9月—2018年1月中国子宫颈癌筛查多中心研究(CHIMUST)项目5个筛查点的8856例妇女中,选取其中医生取样或自取样标本中任一检测方法HPV阳性或HPV阴性但细胞学结果≥低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)者共1495例行BMRT-HPV检测,同时按照1∶2比例抽取年龄和参加筛查时间相匹配的HPV与细胞学结果均为阴性的2990例为对照。CHIMUST项目中对任一HPV阳性妇女回叫行阴道镜下子宫颈病灶四象限定点活检^+随机活检^+子宫颈管搔刮术方案子宫颈活检,以医生取样标本的基于实时PCR技术的Cobas 4800 HPV检测(Cobas-HPV)、基于第2代基因测序技术的HPV分型检测(SEQ-HPV)为对照,以子宫颈活检病理诊断为“金标准”,分析BMRT-HPV检测的高危型HPV(HR-HPV)亚型与Cobas-HPV、SEQ-HPV检测的一致性,并比较3种HPV检测方法对子宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)Ⅱ及以上级别病变(CINⅡ^+)、CINⅢ及以上级别病变(CINⅢ^+)的筛查效率。结果(1)BMRT-HPV检测方法分别与Cobas-HPV、SEQ-HPV检测方法比较,检测HR-HPV亚型整体的一致性分别为94.8%、94.4%,Kappa值分别为0.827、0.814。(2)BMRT-HPV、Cobas-HPV、SEQ-HPV 3种方法对CINⅡ^+筛查的敏感度分别为92.62%、94.26%、93.44%,两两比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);特异度分别为84.67%、83.25%、82.76%,BMRT-HPV检测对CINⅡ^+筛查的特异度显著高于Cobas-HPV、SEQ-HPV检测(P<0.01)。3种HPV检测方法对CINⅢ^+筛查的敏感度均达到100.00%,BMRT-HPV检测对CINⅢ^+筛查的特异度也显著高于Cobas-HPV、SEQ-HPV检测(分别为83.40%、81.95%、81.50%,P<0.01)。检出1例CINⅡ^+或CINⅢ^+所需要行阴道镜下子宫颈活检病理检查的患者数,BMRT-HPV检测显著少于Cobas-HPV和SEQ-HPV检测(P<0.01)。Cobas-HPV、SEQ-HPV、BMRT-HPV检测初筛阳性者分别以HPV 16和(或)18型(HPV 16/18型)阳性联合细胞学结果≥未明确诊断意义的不典型鳞状上皮细胞(ASCUS;即为方案一、二、三)进行二次分流,3种筛查方案对CINⅡ^+、CINⅢ^+筛查的敏感度分别比较均无显著差异(P>0.05),但方案三(即BMRT-HPV初筛阳性者)筛查CINⅡ^+、CINⅢ^+的特异度显著高于方案一(即Cobas-HPV初筛阳性者)和方案二(即SEQ-HPV初筛阳性者;P<0.05),而且阴道镜转诊率方案三也显著低于方案一、二(P<0.05)。结论BMRT-HPV检测筛查子宫颈癌具有与Cobas-HPV、SEQ-HPV检测相似的敏感度,但特异度更高,可作为子宫颈癌的初筛方法,值得临床推广使用。 展开更多
关键词 宫颈肿瘤 乳头状瘤病毒感染 人乳头瘤病毒16 人乳头瘤病毒18 基因型 病毒载量
原文传递
p16^INK4a免疫细胞化学染色在子宫颈癌筛查中的应用价值 被引量:18
5
作者 宋方彬 杜辉 +7 位作者 肖爱民 王纯 黄霞 阎培莎 刘志红 渠新风 Jerome L Belinson 吴瑞芳 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第11期784-790,共7页
目的探讨p16^INK4a免疫细胞化学染色(p16^INK4a染色)作为新一代子宫颈细胞学检查技术在人群子宫颈癌初筛与辅助常规细胞学检查及高危型(HR)-HPV初筛后的二次筛查中的价值。方法募集2016—2018年深圳及周边地区25~65岁有性生活的非妊娠... 目的探讨p16^INK4a免疫细胞化学染色(p16^INK4a染色)作为新一代子宫颈细胞学检查技术在人群子宫颈癌初筛与辅助常规细胞学检查及高危型(HR)-HPV初筛后的二次筛查中的价值。方法募集2016—2018年深圳及周边地区25~65岁有性生活的非妊娠期妇女5747例,采用HR-HPV联合子宫颈液基细胞学检查(LCT)进行子宫颈癌初筛;并行p16^INK4a染色,其中902例在初筛的同时进行p16^INK4a染色,其余4845例为HR-HPV与LCT初筛阳性回叫行阴道镜检查时取样进行p16^INK4a染色。将具有完整LCT检查、HR-HPV检测、p16^INK4a染色及子宫颈活检后病理诊断结果者纳入本研究。以组织学病理诊断为“金标准”,评价p16^INK4a染色作为子宫颈癌初筛、辅助LCT检查及HR-HPV初筛后的二次分流方案检出子宫颈病变[即高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)],包括HSIL[子宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)Ⅱ]及以上级别病变[HSIL(CINⅡ)+]、HSIL(CINⅢ)及以上级别病变[HSIL(CINⅢ)+]的筛查效率。结果(1)具有完整LCT检查、HR-HPV检测、p16^INK4a染色及子宫颈活检病理诊断结果者共1097例,纳入本研究。病理诊断:正常子宫颈995例,低级别鳞状上内病变(LSIL)37例、HSIL 64例及子宫颈癌1例,其中HSIL(CINⅡ)+65例,HSIL(CINⅢ)+34例。HSIL(CINⅡ)+患者的p16^INK4a阳性率(89.2%,58/65)显著高于CINⅠ或正常子宫颈者(10.2%,105/1032;P<0.01)。(2)p16^INK4a染色作为初筛方案:与HR-HPV检测比较,p16^INK4a染色检出HSIL(CINⅡ)+、HSIL(CINⅢ)+的敏感度均无显著差异(95.4%与89.2%,94.1%与94.1%;P>0.05),但其特异度均显著增高(82.5%与89.8%,80.2%与87.7%;P<0.05);而与LCT结果≥LSIL比较,p16^INK4a染色检出HSIL(CINⅡ)+、HSIL(CINⅢ)+的敏感度、特异度均无显著差异(P>0.05)。(3)p16^INK4a染色辅助LCT检查:与单独LCT检查或HR-HPV检测辅助LCT检查比较,p16^INK4a染色辅助LCT检查检出HSIL(CINⅡ)+、HSIL(CINⅢ)+的特异度均显著增高(P<0.01),而敏感度均无显著差异(P>0.05)。(4)p16^INK4a染色作为二次分流方案:HR-HPV初筛后以p16^INK4a阳性作为二次分流指标与LCT结果≥ASCUS作为二次分流指标比较,检出HSIL(CINⅡ)+、HSIL(CINⅢ)+的敏感度均无显著差异(84.6%与90.8%,88.2%与91.2%;P>0.05),而特异度均有显著差异(94.1%与89.7%,91.9%与87.4%;P<0.01);作为二次分流方案,HPV 16和(或)18型(HPV 16/18型)阳性与p16^INK4a阳性序贯的方案,HPV 16/18型阳性与LCT结果≥ASCUS序贯的方案,两种方案比较,检出HSIL(CINⅢ)+的敏感度无显著差异(分别为88.2%、94.1%,P=0.500),而前者的特异度显著增高(分别为88.3%、83.0%,P<0.01),且前者的阴道镜转诊率显著降低(分别为14.0%、19.4%,P=0.005)。结论p16^INK4a染色作为子宫颈癌初筛方案检出子宫颈病变的敏感度与HR-HPV检测相当、特异度与LCT检查相当;且在HR-HPV阳性患者的二次分流中具有优势,并可辅助LCT检查进行诊断分级,提高了子宫颈细胞学筛查的准确率。 展开更多
关键词 宫颈肿瘤 癌症早期检测 宫颈上皮内瘤样病变 周期素依赖激酶抑制剂p16 乳头状瘤病毒科 免疫组织化学
原文传递
自取样本高危型HPV分型检测的子宫颈癌初筛及其联合细胞学或病毒载量的二次筛查方案的评价 被引量:6
6
作者 郭春磊 罗红学 +5 位作者 王纯 渠新风 Yang Bin Belinson JL 杜辉 吴瑞芳 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第4期271-279,共9页
目的评价阴道自取样本高危型HPV(HR-HPV)分型检测用于子宫颈癌初筛的筛查效率,并探讨以不同HR-HPV亚型组合联合医生取样本的细胞学检查或HR-HPV病毒载量检测对自取样本HR-HPV阳性者进行二次筛查的筛查效率。方法本研究的数据来自2009年... 目的评价阴道自取样本高危型HPV(HR-HPV)分型检测用于子宫颈癌初筛的筛查效率,并探讨以不同HR-HPV亚型组合联合医生取样本的细胞学检查或HR-HPV病毒载量检测对自取样本HR-HPV阳性者进行二次筛查的筛查效率。方法本研究的数据来自2009年4月至2010年4月深圳市子宫颈癌筛查项目Ⅱ(SHENCCAST-Ⅱ)数据库,收集其中有自取样本的基质辅助激光解吸电离-飞行时间质谱分析(MALDI-TOF-MS)技术进行的HR-HPV分型检测结果以及医生取样本的第2代杂交捕获技术(HC-Ⅱ)检测的HR-HPV病毒载量结果、子宫颈细胞学检查结果的妇女共8556例,转诊阴道镜检查者均有活检组织病理检查结果。分析自取样本HR-HPV分型检测作为子宫颈癌初筛方案(即方案1)时,基于其不同HR-HPV亚型组合[包括5个亚方案,即1a:HPV 16和(或)18型(HPV 16/18型)阳性;1b:HPV 16/18/58型阳性;1c:HPV 16/18/58/31/33型阳性;1d:HPV 16/18/58/31/33/52型阳性;1e:所有14种HR-HPV亚型中任一亚型阳性]的阴道镜转诊方案检出子宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)Ⅱ及以上病变(CINⅡ+)、CINⅢ及以上病变(CINⅢ+)的敏感度与特异度;并以自取样本HR-HPV初筛阳性者即以方案1中的各亚方案为基础,对比分析其联合医生取样本的细胞学检查(即方案2,包括2a、2b、2c、2d、2e共5个亚方案)或HR-HPV病毒载量检测(即方案3,包括3a、3b、3c、3d共4个亚方案)作为分流指标的二次筛查方案的筛查效率。结果(1)本研究纳入的8556例妇女的年龄为(38.9±7.9)岁,自取样本检测的HR-HPV阳性率为13.77%(1178/8556),其中HPV 16/18型、HPV 16/18/58型、HPV 16/18/58/31/33型和HPV 16/18/58/31/33/52型组合的阳性率分别为3.16%(270/8556)、5.14%(440/8556)、6.66%(570/8556)和9.81%(839/8556)。医生取样本的HR-HPV病毒载量≥10相对光单位/临床阈值(RLU/CO)者占8.87%(759/8556),细胞学结果≥未明确诊断意义的不典型鳞状上皮细胞(ASCUS)者占12.05%(1031/8556)。(2)方案1中,所有14种HR-HPV亚型中任一亚型阳性者(即方案1e)行阴道镜检查对检出CINⅡ+、CINⅢ+的敏感度在所有方案(包括3个方案共14个亚方案)中最高(分别为92.70%、94.33%),但是特异度和阳性预测值(PPV)在所有方案中最低(特异度分别为88.44%、87.58%,PPV分别为18.34%、11.29%),且阴道镜检查率在所有方案中最高(为13.77%)。方案1的其他亚方案(即方案1a、1b、1c、1d)中,检出CINⅡ+、CINⅢ+的特异度方案1a最高,分别为97.92%、97.69%,其他亚方案也较高,均达90%以上;但敏感度方案1d最高(分别为88.41%、92.20%)。(3)HPV 16/18型阳性者直接行阴道镜检查(即方案1a),非HPV 16/18型阳性者行医生取样本细胞学检查或HR-HPV病毒载量检测,细胞学结果达到阈值(≥ASCUS,即方案2a)或病毒载量达到阈值(≥10 RUL/CO,即方案3a)者行阴道镜检查,其阴道镜转诊率低,而筛查CINⅡ+、CINⅢ+的敏感度和特异度则较高。若在此两个二次筛查方案基础上,首先根据自取样本HR-HPV分型检测结果,依次增加另外4种HR-HPV亚型(即HPV 58、31、33和52型)阳性者行阴道镜检查,再以细胞学检查或病毒载量检测结果进行二次分流,筛查CINⅡ+、CINⅢ+的敏感度也相应提高。结论以自取样本HR-HPV分型检测为子宫颈癌初筛方案,以及其联合细胞学检查或病毒载量检测进行二次筛查的方案,可以在筛查CINⅡ+、CINⅢ+的敏感度、特异度以及阴道镜检查率之间获得较好的平衡;将HPV 58、31、33、52型纳入HPV 16/18型阳性的初筛分流指标,并联合细胞学检查或病毒载量检测的序贯二次筛查,可进一步提高筛查效率。 展开更多
关键词 宫颈肿瘤 阴道涂片 活组织检查 乳头状瘤病毒科 病毒载量
原文传递
Evaluation of dry specimen transport and processing time using an isothermal amplification high-risk human papillomavirus assay
7
作者 Longhua Hu Suhui Wu +5 位作者 Haixia Shang Jerome Belinson Jinhong Li Xiaoqin Wu Yaling Huang Jingfen Sun 《Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine》 2022年第1期34-37,共4页
Background:Dry specimen transport has shown equivalence to traditional liquid transport using a novel high-risk Human papillomavirus assay.Considering that dry transport might cross obstacles during cervical cancer sc... Background:Dry specimen transport has shown equivalence to traditional liquid transport using a novel high-risk Human papillomavirus assay.Considering that dry transport might cross obstacles during cervical cancer screening in low and middle resource settings,this study was designed evaluate different processing time of dry specimen transport using the same isothermal amplification hrHPV assay.Methods:There were 564 women between the ages of 30–55 recruited from colposcopy clinic.For each patient,two endocervical samples were collected and placed into empty collection tubes by physician.Samples were stored at room temperature until analyzed for hrHPV using the AmpFire assay at two time points:2 days and 2 weeks.511 of the 564 participants with positive hrHPV were provided colposcopy exam and quadrant biopsy.Results:A total of 1128 endocervical samples from 564 patients were detected by the Ampfire assay.Good agreement was found between two time periods(KappaStandard error=0.67±0.04).Sensitivity(2days/2weeks)for CIN2t was 95.28%(95%CI:92.14%–98.42%)vs 90.57%(CI(86.65%–94.49%)and specificity(2days/2weeks)was 22.47%(CI 19.33%–25.61%)vs 28.15%(CI 24.23%–32.07%)respectively.The difference for Ampfire HPV detection in sensitivity for CIN2t for the two time periods was not significant(P=0.227),while the difference in specificity for CIN2t was significant(P=0.001).The difference in Ct values 29.23(CI 28.15–30.31)and 29.27(CI 28.19–30.35)between two time points was not significant(P?0.164).Conclusion:Processing dry brush specimens can be delayed up to 2 weeks.Using the AmpFire assay platform which supports cervical cancer prevention programs in low-to-middle-income countries(LMICs). 展开更多
关键词 Cervical cancer SCREENING High-risk human papillomavirus Specimen transport Processing time Sample preparation
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部