The origin of overpressure and its effect on petroleum accumulation in the large Permian/Triassic conglomerate oil province in the Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin have been investigated based on comprehensive analysis of log c...The origin of overpressure and its effect on petroleum accumulation in the large Permian/Triassic conglomerate oil province in the Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin have been investigated based on comprehensive analysis of log curve combinations,loading-unloading curves,sonic velocity-density cross-plot,and porosity comparison data.The study results show that there are two kinds of normal compaction models in the study area,namely,two-stage linear model and exponent model;overpressure in the large conglomerate reservoirs including Lower Triassic Baikouquan Formation and Permian Upper and Lower Wu’erhe Formations is the result of pressure transfer,and the source of overpressure is the overpressure caused by hydrocarbon generation of Permian Fengcheng Formation major source rock.The petroleum migrated through faults under the driving of hydrocarbon generation overpressure into the reservoirs to accumulate,forming the Permian and Triassic overpressure oil and gas reservoirs.The occurrence and distribution of overpressure are controlled by the source rock maturity and strike-slip faults connecting the source rock and conglomerate reservoirs formed from Indosinian Movement to Himalayan Movement.As overpressure is the driving force for petroleum migration in the large Mahu oil province,the formation and distribution of petroleum reservoirs above the source rock in this area may have a close relationship with the occurrence of overpressure.展开更多
In order to evaluate the stress sensitivity of carbonate reservoirs,a series of rock stress sensitivity tests were carried out under in-situ formation temperature and stress condition.Based on the calibration of capil...In order to evaluate the stress sensitivity of carbonate reservoirs,a series of rock stress sensitivity tests were carried out under in-situ formation temperature and stress condition.Based on the calibration of capillary pressure curve,the variable fractal dimension was introduced to establish the conversion formula between relaxation time and pore size.By using the nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR)method,the pore volume loss caused by stress sensitivity within different scales of pore throat was quantitatively analyzed,and the microscopic mechanism of stress sensitivity of carbonate gas reservoirs was clarified.The results show that fractures can significantly affect the stress sensitivity of carbonate reservoirs.With the increase of initial permeability,the stress sensitivity coefficient decreases and then increases for porous reservoirs,but increases monotonously for fractured-porous reservoirs.The pore volume loss caused by stress sensitivity mainly occurs for mesopores(0.02–0.50μm),contributing more than 50%of the total volume loss.Single high-angle fracture contributes 9.6%of the stress sensitivity and 15.7%of the irreversible damage.The microscopic mechanism of the stress sensitivity of carbonate gas reservoirs can be concluded as fracture closure,elastic contraction of pores and plastic deformation of rock skeleton.展开更多
1 Introduction Permeability of Member-6,Member-7,and Member-8,Triassic Yangchang Formation in Ordos Basin is lower than 1?0-3μm2,so sandstone in those formations are typical tight reservoir(Zhao et al.,2012a,2012b;Y...1 Introduction Permeability of Member-6,Member-7,and Member-8,Triassic Yangchang Formation in Ordos Basin is lower than 1?0-3μm2,so sandstone in those formations are typical tight reservoir(Zhao et al.,2012a,2012b;Yang et al.,2013).Because of the maximum flooding event of Late Triassic during deposition of Chang-7 Member,the lacustrine basin had a wide range of deposition area展开更多
The microstructure differences of the Triassic Chang 6 and Chang 8 members tight reservoirs in the Longdong area of Ordos Basin were compared by means of cast thin sections, scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffrac...The microstructure differences of the Triassic Chang 6 and Chang 8 members tight reservoirs in the Longdong area of Ordos Basin were compared by means of cast thin sections, scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction, and constant rate mercury injection. Their pore evolution models were established, and the effects of main diagenesis on densification were examined. The throat is the main factor controlling the physical properties of the Chang 6 and Chang 8 members reservoirs: The lower the permeability, the smaller and the more concentrated the throat radius and the larger the proportion of the throats in the effective storage space. There are several obvious differences between Chang 6 and Chang 8 members:(1) with the increase of permeability, the contribution of the relative large throats to the permeability in the Chang 8 member reservoir is more than that in the Chang 6 member reservoir;(2) the control effect on pore-throat ratio of the nano-throats in the Chang 6 member reservoir is more significant. The sedimentary action determines the primary pore structure of the Chang 6 and Chang 8 members sand bodies, and the diagenesis is the main factor controlling the densification of the reservoirs. Because of the difference in rock fabrics and the chlorite content of Chang 6 and Chang 8, the strong compaction resulted in less porosity reduction(17%) of the Chang 81 reservoir with larger buried depth and larger ground temperature than the Chang 63 reservoir(19%). The siliceous, calcareous and clay minerals cement filling the pores and blocking the pore throat, which is the key factor causing the big differences between the reservoir permeability of Chang 6 and Chang 8 members.展开更多
基金Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41502132)the China National Science and Technology Major Project(2017ZX05001-004)
文摘The origin of overpressure and its effect on petroleum accumulation in the large Permian/Triassic conglomerate oil province in the Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin have been investigated based on comprehensive analysis of log curve combinations,loading-unloading curves,sonic velocity-density cross-plot,and porosity comparison data.The study results show that there are two kinds of normal compaction models in the study area,namely,two-stage linear model and exponent model;overpressure in the large conglomerate reservoirs including Lower Triassic Baikouquan Formation and Permian Upper and Lower Wu’erhe Formations is the result of pressure transfer,and the source of overpressure is the overpressure caused by hydrocarbon generation of Permian Fengcheng Formation major source rock.The petroleum migrated through faults under the driving of hydrocarbon generation overpressure into the reservoirs to accumulate,forming the Permian and Triassic overpressure oil and gas reservoirs.The occurrence and distribution of overpressure are controlled by the source rock maturity and strike-slip faults connecting the source rock and conglomerate reservoirs formed from Indosinian Movement to Himalayan Movement.As overpressure is the driving force for petroleum migration in the large Mahu oil province,the formation and distribution of petroleum reservoirs above the source rock in this area may have a close relationship with the occurrence of overpressure.
基金Supported by the PetroChina Technological Research Project(2021DJ3301)Scientific Research Project of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education,China(20JK0848)。
文摘In order to evaluate the stress sensitivity of carbonate reservoirs,a series of rock stress sensitivity tests were carried out under in-situ formation temperature and stress condition.Based on the calibration of capillary pressure curve,the variable fractal dimension was introduced to establish the conversion formula between relaxation time and pore size.By using the nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR)method,the pore volume loss caused by stress sensitivity within different scales of pore throat was quantitatively analyzed,and the microscopic mechanism of stress sensitivity of carbonate gas reservoirs was clarified.The results show that fractures can significantly affect the stress sensitivity of carbonate reservoirs.With the increase of initial permeability,the stress sensitivity coefficient decreases and then increases for porous reservoirs,but increases monotonously for fractured-porous reservoirs.The pore volume loss caused by stress sensitivity mainly occurs for mesopores(0.02–0.50μm),contributing more than 50%of the total volume loss.Single high-angle fracture contributes 9.6%of the stress sensitivity and 15.7%of the irreversible damage.The microscopic mechanism of the stress sensitivity of carbonate gas reservoirs can be concluded as fracture closure,elastic contraction of pores and plastic deformation of rock skeleton.
文摘1 Introduction Permeability of Member-6,Member-7,and Member-8,Triassic Yangchang Formation in Ordos Basin is lower than 1?0-3μm2,so sandstone in those formations are typical tight reservoir(Zhao et al.,2012a,2012b;Yang et al.,2013).Because of the maximum flooding event of Late Triassic during deposition of Chang-7 Member,the lacustrine basin had a wide range of deposition area
基金Supported by the China National Science and Technology Major Project(20162X050500062011ZX05044)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41102083)
文摘The microstructure differences of the Triassic Chang 6 and Chang 8 members tight reservoirs in the Longdong area of Ordos Basin were compared by means of cast thin sections, scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction, and constant rate mercury injection. Their pore evolution models were established, and the effects of main diagenesis on densification were examined. The throat is the main factor controlling the physical properties of the Chang 6 and Chang 8 members reservoirs: The lower the permeability, the smaller and the more concentrated the throat radius and the larger the proportion of the throats in the effective storage space. There are several obvious differences between Chang 6 and Chang 8 members:(1) with the increase of permeability, the contribution of the relative large throats to the permeability in the Chang 8 member reservoir is more than that in the Chang 6 member reservoir;(2) the control effect on pore-throat ratio of the nano-throats in the Chang 6 member reservoir is more significant. The sedimentary action determines the primary pore structure of the Chang 6 and Chang 8 members sand bodies, and the diagenesis is the main factor controlling the densification of the reservoirs. Because of the difference in rock fabrics and the chlorite content of Chang 6 and Chang 8, the strong compaction resulted in less porosity reduction(17%) of the Chang 81 reservoir with larger buried depth and larger ground temperature than the Chang 63 reservoir(19%). The siliceous, calcareous and clay minerals cement filling the pores and blocking the pore throat, which is the key factor causing the big differences between the reservoir permeability of Chang 6 and Chang 8 members.