<strong>Importance:</strong> Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the pandemic claiming millions of lives since the first outbr...<strong>Importance:</strong> Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the pandemic claiming millions of lives since the first outbreak was reported in Wuhan, China during December 2019. It is thus important to make cross-country comparison of the relevant rates and understand the socio-demographic risk factors. <strong>Methods: </strong>This is a record based retrospective cohort study. <strong>Table 1</strong> was extracted from <a href="https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/" target="_blank">https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/</a> and from the Corona virus resource center (<strong>Table 2</strong>, <strong>Figures 1-3</strong>), Johns Hopkins University. Data for <strong>Table 1</strong> includes all countries which reported >1000 cases and <strong>Table 2</strong> includes 20 countries reporting the largest number of deaths. The estimation of CFR, RR and PR of the infection, and disease pattern across geographical clusters in the world is presented. <strong>Results:</strong> From <strong>Table 1</strong>, we could infer that as on 4<sup>th</sup> May 2020, COVID-19 has rapidly spread world-wide with total infections of 3,566,423 and mortality of 248,291. The maximum morbidity is in USA with 1,188,122 cases and 68,598 deaths (CFR 5.77%, RR 15% and PR 16.51%), while Spain is at the second position with 247,122 cases and 25,264 deaths (CFR 13.71%, RR 38.75%, PR 9.78%). <strong>Table 2</strong> depicts the scenario as on 8<sup>th</sup> October 2020, where-in the highest number of confirmed cases occurred in US followed by India and Brazil (cases per million population: 23,080, 5007 & 23,872 respectively). For deaths per million population: US recorded 647, while India and Brazil recorded 77 and 708 respectively. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Studying the distribution of relevant rates across different geographical clusters plays a major role for measuring the disease burden, which in-turn enables implementation of appropriate public healthcare measures.展开更多
Mapping built land cover at unprecedented detail has been facilitated by increasing availability of global high-resolution imagery and image processing methods.These advances in urban feature extraction and built-area...Mapping built land cover at unprecedented detail has been facilitated by increasing availability of global high-resolution imagery and image processing methods.These advances in urban feature extraction and built-area detection can refine the mapping of human population densities,especially in lower income countries where rapid urbanization and changing population is accompanied by frequently out-of-date or inaccurate census data.However,in these contexts it is unclear how best to use built-area data to disaggregate areal,count-based census data.Here we tested two methods using remotely sensed,built-area land cover data to disaggregate population data.These included simple,areal weighting and more complex statistical models with other ancillary information.Outcomes were assessed across eleven countries,representing different world regions varying in population densities,types of built infrastructure,and environmental characteristics.We found that for seven of 11 countries a Random Forest-based,machine learning approach outperforms simple,binary dasymetric disaggregation into remotely-sensed built areas.For these more complex models there was little evidence to support using any single built land cover input over the rest,and in most cases using more than one built-area data product resulted in higher predictive capacity.We discuss these results and implications for future population modeling approaches.展开更多
Large-scale gridded population datasets are usually produced for the year of input census data using a top-down approach and projected backward and forward in time using national growth rates.Such temporal projections...Large-scale gridded population datasets are usually produced for the year of input census data using a top-down approach and projected backward and forward in time using national growth rates.Such temporal projections do not include any subnational variation in population distribution trends and ignore changes in geographical covariates such as urban land cover changes.Improved predictions of population distribution changes over time require the use of a limited number of covariates that are time-invariant or temporally explicit.Here we make use of recently released multi-temporal high-resolution global settlement layers,historical census data and latest developments in population distribution modelling methods to reconstruct population distribution changes over 30 years across the Kenyan Coast.We explore the methodological challenges associated with the production of gridded population distribution time-series in data-scarce countries and show that trade-offs have to be found between spatial and temporal resolutions when selecting the best modelling approach.Strategies used to fill data gaps may vary according to the local context and the objective of the study.This work will hopefully serve as a benchmark for future developments of population distribution time-series that are increasingly required for population-at-risk estimations and spatial modelling in various fields.展开更多
文摘<strong>Importance:</strong> Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the pandemic claiming millions of lives since the first outbreak was reported in Wuhan, China during December 2019. It is thus important to make cross-country comparison of the relevant rates and understand the socio-demographic risk factors. <strong>Methods: </strong>This is a record based retrospective cohort study. <strong>Table 1</strong> was extracted from <a href="https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/" target="_blank">https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/</a> and from the Corona virus resource center (<strong>Table 2</strong>, <strong>Figures 1-3</strong>), Johns Hopkins University. Data for <strong>Table 1</strong> includes all countries which reported >1000 cases and <strong>Table 2</strong> includes 20 countries reporting the largest number of deaths. The estimation of CFR, RR and PR of the infection, and disease pattern across geographical clusters in the world is presented. <strong>Results:</strong> From <strong>Table 1</strong>, we could infer that as on 4<sup>th</sup> May 2020, COVID-19 has rapidly spread world-wide with total infections of 3,566,423 and mortality of 248,291. The maximum morbidity is in USA with 1,188,122 cases and 68,598 deaths (CFR 5.77%, RR 15% and PR 16.51%), while Spain is at the second position with 247,122 cases and 25,264 deaths (CFR 13.71%, RR 38.75%, PR 9.78%). <strong>Table 2</strong> depicts the scenario as on 8<sup>th</sup> October 2020, where-in the highest number of confirmed cases occurred in US followed by India and Brazil (cases per million population: 23,080, 5007 & 23,872 respectively). For deaths per million population: US recorded 647, while India and Brazil recorded 77 and 708 respectively. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Studying the distribution of relevant rates across different geographical clusters plays a major role for measuring the disease burden, which in-turn enables implementation of appropriate public healthcare measures.
基金FRS,AEG,JNN,AK,and AS are funded by the Bill&Melinda Gates Foundation(OPP1134076)AJT is supported by funding from U.S.National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases(U19AI089674)+1 种基金the Bill&Melinda Gates Foundation(OPP1106427,OPP1032350,OPP1134076)the Clinton Health Access Initiative,National Institutes of Health,and a Wellcome Trust Sustaining Health Grant(106866/Z/15/Z).
文摘Mapping built land cover at unprecedented detail has been facilitated by increasing availability of global high-resolution imagery and image processing methods.These advances in urban feature extraction and built-area detection can refine the mapping of human population densities,especially in lower income countries where rapid urbanization and changing population is accompanied by frequently out-of-date or inaccurate census data.However,in these contexts it is unclear how best to use built-area data to disaggregate areal,count-based census data.Here we tested two methods using remotely sensed,built-area land cover data to disaggregate population data.These included simple,areal weighting and more complex statistical models with other ancillary information.Outcomes were assessed across eleven countries,representing different world regions varying in population densities,types of built infrastructure,and environmental characteristics.We found that for seven of 11 countries a Random Forest-based,machine learning approach outperforms simple,binary dasymetric disaggregation into remotely-sensed built areas.For these more complex models there was little evidence to support using any single built land cover input over the rest,and in most cases using more than one built-area data product resulted in higher predictive capacity.We discuss these results and implications for future population modeling approaches.
基金supported by the Belgian Science Policy(BELSPO)under the Research programme for Earth Obser-vation“STEREO III”[grant number SR/00/304]AJT is supported by a Wellcome Trust Sustaining Health Grant(106866/Z/15/Z)+4 种基金AJT,AS,AEG and FRS are supported by funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation[grant number OPP1106427],[grant number 1032350][grant number OPP1134076]supported by the Well-come Trust,UK as an intermediate fellow[grant number 095127]RWS is supported by the Wellcome Trust as Prin-cipal Research Fellow[grant number 103602]that also supported CWK.CWK is also grateful to the KEMRI Wellcome Trust Overseas Programme Strategic Award[grant number 084538]for additional support.
文摘Large-scale gridded population datasets are usually produced for the year of input census data using a top-down approach and projected backward and forward in time using national growth rates.Such temporal projections do not include any subnational variation in population distribution trends and ignore changes in geographical covariates such as urban land cover changes.Improved predictions of population distribution changes over time require the use of a limited number of covariates that are time-invariant or temporally explicit.Here we make use of recently released multi-temporal high-resolution global settlement layers,historical census data and latest developments in population distribution modelling methods to reconstruct population distribution changes over 30 years across the Kenyan Coast.We explore the methodological challenges associated with the production of gridded population distribution time-series in data-scarce countries and show that trade-offs have to be found between spatial and temporal resolutions when selecting the best modelling approach.Strategies used to fill data gaps may vary according to the local context and the objective of the study.This work will hopefully serve as a benchmark for future developments of population distribution time-series that are increasingly required for population-at-risk estimations and spatial modelling in various fields.