Predicting outcomes after kidney transplantation: Can Pareto’s rules help us to do so?

Kidney transplantation is the best option for kidney replacement therapy,even considering that most of the times the grafts do not survive as long as their recipients.In the Khalil et al's experience,published in this issue of the Journal,they analyze their second kidney graft survival and describe those significant predictors of early loss.This editorial comments on the results and put in perspective that most of the times,long-term graft survival could be inadvertently jeopardized if the immunosuppressive therapy is reduced or withdrawn for any reason,and that it could happen frequently if the transplant physician intends to innovate with the clinical care without proper evidence-based data.

Is the near coming xenotransplantation era relieving us from needing to look for more non-living organ donors?

Despite organ transplantation being the most successful treatment for end-stage organ dysfunction,the number of annual solid organ transplantations is much lower than that required to satisfy the demand of patients on waiting lists.The explanation for this phenomenon is the relative scarcity of non-living organ donors due to several factors,such as:(1)Late arrival of patients with a neurocritical condition to an emergency service;(2)lack of detection of those patients as possible organ donors by health professionals dedicated to procurement or by clinicians at emergency and intensive care units,for instance;(3)late transfer of the patient to an intensive care unit to try to recover their health and to provide hemodynamic,ventilatory,and metabolic support;(4)lack of confirmation of the physiological status of the possible donor;(5)late or incorrect positive diagnosis of the subject’s death,either due to brain or cardiac death;(6)difficulty in obtaining legal authorization,either by direct relatives or by the authority,for the extraction of organs;and(7)deficient retrieval surgery of the organs actually donated.The recent reports of relatively successful xenotransplants from genetically modified pigs open the possibility to fix this mismatch between supply and demand,but some technical(organ rejection and opportunistic infections),and economic issues,still remain before accepting a progressive replacement of the organ sources for transplantation.An approximate economic cost analysis suggests that the hypothetical acquisition cost of any genetically modified pig derived organ is high and would not even satisfy the solid organ demand of the wealthiest countries.

Critical care specialists,the missing link in organ procurement for transplantation

The procurement process for organ donation begins with the identification of potential organ donors in emergency or critical care units(CCU),followed by their clinical evaluation,diagnostic procedures,and therapeutic interventions,mostly conducted in CCUs.It concludes with the request for organ donation and,if accepted,the retrieval of organs.Despite most interventions occurring in detection units,there has been a neglect of the strategic role played by critical care specialists(CCS)in managing and caring for brain-dead or near-brain-death patients.Questions arise:Are they willing to undertake this responsibility?Do they fully comprehend the nature of organ procurement?Are they aware of the specific interventions required to maintain possible organ donors in optimal physiological condition?Our objective is to examine the role of CCS in organ procurement and propose ways to enhance it,ultimately aiming to increase and enhance organ donation rates.