The methods of deriving FeO and TiO_(2)contents from the Clementine spacecraft data were discussed,and an approach was developed to derive the content from the measurements using the Moon Mineralogy Mapper(M3)instrume...The methods of deriving FeO and TiO_(2)contents from the Clementine spacecraft data were discussed,and an approach was developed to derive the content from the measurements using the Moon Mineralogy Mapper(M3)instrument on Chandrayaan-1.The density of lunar bedrock was then modeled on the basis of the derived FeO and TiO_(2)abundances.The FeO and TiO_(2)abundances derived from the M^(3)data were compared with the previous results of the Clementine data and were in good agreement.The FeO abundance data also agreed well with the Lunar Prospector data,which were used as an independent source.The previous Clementine and newly M3 derived abundances were compared with the laboratory measured FeO and TiO2 contents in the Apollo and Luna returned samples.The Clementine derived FeO content was systematically 1%–2%lower than the laboratory measurements in all the returned samples.The M^(3)derived content agreed well with the returned Apollo samples and was within±2.8%of the laboratory measurements.The Clementine derived TiO2 abundance was systematically 0.1%–4%higher than the laboratory measurements of the returned samples.The M3 derived TiO_(2)agreed well(±0.6%)with the laboratory measurements of the returned samples,except for samples with high TiO2 content.However,these results should be carefully interpreted because the error range requires verification.No error analysis was provided with the previous Clementine derived contents.展开更多
文摘The methods of deriving FeO and TiO_(2)contents from the Clementine spacecraft data were discussed,and an approach was developed to derive the content from the measurements using the Moon Mineralogy Mapper(M3)instrument on Chandrayaan-1.The density of lunar bedrock was then modeled on the basis of the derived FeO and TiO_(2)abundances.The FeO and TiO_(2)abundances derived from the M^(3)data were compared with the previous results of the Clementine data and were in good agreement.The FeO abundance data also agreed well with the Lunar Prospector data,which were used as an independent source.The previous Clementine and newly M3 derived abundances were compared with the laboratory measured FeO and TiO2 contents in the Apollo and Luna returned samples.The Clementine derived FeO content was systematically 1%–2%lower than the laboratory measurements in all the returned samples.The M^(3)derived content agreed well with the returned Apollo samples and was within±2.8%of the laboratory measurements.The Clementine derived TiO2 abundance was systematically 0.1%–4%higher than the laboratory measurements of the returned samples.The M3 derived TiO_(2)agreed well(±0.6%)with the laboratory measurements of the returned samples,except for samples with high TiO2 content.However,these results should be carefully interpreted because the error range requires verification.No error analysis was provided with the previous Clementine derived contents.
